The Stormers could be facing the early departure of flanker Ben-Jason Dixon as contractual tensions continue to mount between the player and the union. With arbitration looming, Dixon’s long-term stay in the Cape is far from guaranteed.
According to a recent report by News24, the 27-year-old Springbok, currently sidelined with a wrist injury, is at the centre of a contractual disagreement involving a release clause in his newly inked deal with the Stormers. The clause, and how it is interpreted by each party, is reportedly the root cause of the impasse.
Dixon, who has five Test caps for the Springboks and has been a workhorse in the Stormers’ forward pack, was seen as a central figure in their long-term plans. However, should the disagreement remain unresolved, sources suggest Dixon’s camp could escalate the matter to arbitration – a move that could open the door for his early exit from the franchise, despite having two years left on his current contract.
Silence from Both Camps
Attempts to get comment from either Stormers director of rugby John Dobson or Dixon’s agent have so far proven unsuccessful, with both camps opting to keep discussions behind closed doors. That’s not unusual in high-stakes negotiations, particularly when legal or arbitration routes are being considered.
Big Blow for the Stormers?
Should Dixon depart, it would mark a significant blow to the Stormers, who are currently rebuilding depth in their loose forward department. His versatility, athleticism, and physical presence around the park have made him one of the more consistent performers in the squad over the past few seasons.
Notably, Dixon’s form earned him a Springbok call-up, and with a long Test career still very much on the cards, clarity around his club future will be vital for both him and the national selectors.
The Bigger Picture in SA Rugby
This situation also raises broader questions about contract security and transparency within South African rugby. As more players become aware of their market value – both locally and abroad – disputes over release clauses, image rights, and overseas opportunities are becoming increasingly common.
For unions, managing this dynamic while retaining top talent is an ongoing balancing act, especially in the era of global competitions and rising European interest in South African players.
What Happens in Athlete Arbitration?
Should the dispute go to arbitration, here’s a quick look at what that entails:
- Arbitration is an alternative legal process used to resolve contract disputes between parties (in this case, a player and a union or club).
- It is typically less formal than court, but still legally binding.
- Both parties agree to present their case to an independent arbitrator or panel, who will review the contract terms, listen to arguments, and issue a ruling.
- If the arbitrator finds that Dixon’s release clause was triggered or misinterpreted in a way that supports his claim, he may be free to leave the Stormers immediately or negotiate a buy-out.
The process can take anywhere from a few weeks to several months, depending on complexity, but it is generally faster and more private than court litigation.
